Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
狂野战斗公主无敌版,够爽快,故事经不起细敲,打戏可以,橘势大好,她好爱她
PS：权相宇也老了啊，真是好久不见！
政治正确万岁！公主颜值不太行。好莱坞拍这种后李小龙式动作片都不爱找香港导演了，香港人该好好反思了~不友好的胖子笑话，减分。竹林练功传授手眼心法依然是夸张的东方想象，中世纪铠甲冷兵器打斗倒是有些新意，就是动作设计的节奏有很大问题。
虽然演员不是第一部的了，但结构、剧情没变，同样的喧闹、搞笑和精彩，尤其闪电剑阵创意十足，最后韩孝周的强硬一吻惊艳全场！
总评：4.7+(谁说女子不如男)0.8=5.5分
大女主爽片，曾经公主被困于高塔等待王子救援，现在公主一路杀下塔楼自己称王
媳妇进来问“看啥电影呢”，“非凡公主”，“这是公主”，“嗯”，“公主为啥这么厉害”，“因为非凡”，“哦”。
韩国电影崛起每年都有好几百部片子，良莠不齐，这部，莠…之一。
公主和Linh之间的cp确定不磕起来？！！！
看个演员和动作戏吧 还是蛮喜欢韩孝周姜河那😘
特地为了这第二部看了第一部，比上一部进步很多，无论从画面、特效、剧情都有很大的进步，但比加勒比还是有点距离的。可以说是一部合格的爆米花电影。
仿佛横版冲关游戏一样的剧情，虽然剧情没啥复杂故事，主线推进无非就是在城堡里刷地图，不过动作场面看个爽快还是可以的，还穿插了几场 Boss 战
没剧情，一路打打打，从头打到尾，打斗不出彩也谈不上技巧，但亮点大概就是公主这个设定，不靠联姻，靠武力拯救王国。片荒期有部能看的就行，已经没高要求了
又是潜行又是rougelike式的打杀 又是神秘海域的绳荡 以及神似大树守卫的近战 导演绝对是游戏重度患者
（吴世勋吓我一跳 长得和我记忆中的脸庞略有不同）
这种暴力片最好看还是扎导的《美少女特工队》
另外以后得避坑李光沭了，他确实没演技，还是去玩综艺吧。
因悔婚而被造反者囚禁的公主，一路杀死出救出国王和子民。犹如战神附体！
我觉得可以给7分，动作戏和音乐配合得很好，镜头巧妙，比预期好看不少。
一个人女人不吃不喝，精力充沛打杀一天。机器人吗？😂
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
