The history of Danish country church architecture is told by showing scenes of how the church was used by the congregation, beginning with the celebration of mass in a small and simple wooden church 800 years ago, and ending with the congregation singing in a village church of to-day. The development and the growth of the pattern of church architecture is shown.
Dreyer in this film shows a series of churches from different periods with churchgoers in period clothing. Each period is separated by a shot of a church bell double-exposed on the sky. Although the film has a vibrant and instructive way of communicating the different epochs and styles to students, it does not exhibit the artistic quality that usually distinguishes a Dreyer film, except perhaps in some of the costumes, which were originally made for Day of Wrath.
The board of Dansk Kulturfilm in autumn 1945 decided that their planned church film would exclusively be about village churches. Dreyer would rework the script that was written by editor and folk high-school principal Bernhard Jensen, aided by a committee of experts consisting of architect H. Lønborg-Jensen and Victor Hermansen, curator at the National Museum of Denmark. Dreyer had a first draft ready in mid-March, entitled Kirken er et gammelt Hus ("The Church Is an Old House"), which was distributed to the members of the committee for their comments.
In the last half of July, Dreyer and Victor Hermansen travelled the country to look at suitable churches. They researched the details and at Dreyer’s request a number of technical changes were made to the churches, including the removal of porcelain holders for electrical wiring in Tveje Merløse Church.
On 4 July, Dreyer went in advance to Ringkøbing. Shooting was set to start a few days later with the arrival of the director of photography, Preben Frank, who had fallen off a ladder and broken his leg, Fortunately, he was ready to cautiously start working again within a few days, with his leg in a cast.
Otherwise, the production went without a glitch. Everywhere, Dreyer said, they were well received at the vicarages and they had no problem getting enough extras. On 1 august, they returned to Copenhagen with almost all their footage in the can. They only needed to film the church in Skelby, where the weather had been against them, plus a Swedish wooden church in Hedared. The economy was distressed so soon after the war, especially when it came to foreign currency, but there were no real wooden churches left in Denmark and building an interior set in the studio would be too expensive.
The finished film was shown for the first time on 24 September 1947 to a small, closed circle, which included the Minister for Ecclesiastical Affairs. In December 1947, as was Dansk Kulturfilm’s standard practice, the film was presented to the press, politicians and others on a programme with four other short films.
真挺好看的哈哈哈哈哈。唯独觉得哈，这是写给我们90后80后的故事，跟现在的教育体制不太一样了。
演员这演技和形象随时出戏，尬地我地板都被脚趾扣穿了～
童年最喜欢郑渊洁的童话，能有机会还您电影票的机会真是很好。
罐头小人则太成熟，熟到不能再熟。甚至太老。
儿童电影，还不错。某些镜头小人还是蛮有绿幕感的，感觉小人用动画呈现会不会好点？
为什么评分这么低？好喜欢皮皮鲁和鲁西西啊～希望我们可以有自己的童话宇宙！谢谢郑渊洁。
童年的两个奇人～挺好看的！和娃一起看，真不错，好好陪伴！
挺无聊的。罐头小人没我想象的有趣，就没看了。
郑渊洁加一星。
虽然是陪孩子去看的，但其实孩子是陪我去圆梦的。小时候太喜欢童话大王了!
剧本其实很低龄，不适合大人，但感觉也不完全适合小孩。整个电影院就我一个单独的大人来的。其他全是大人带小朋友来的。旁边的小朋友中后段开始哭，旁边的爸爸一直玩手机，小男生哭的抽抽嗒嗒的笑死我了😆。说回剧情，不狗血，不深刻，小朋友们演的不错。但是故事背景是八零年代，大人角色也有点模版化。但是还是真的很好哭啊，俺的童年。希望郑爷爷的作品能改遍的更好，明明那么好的故事，那么好的立意！
小演员里鲁西西选的还行，皮皮鲁真的有点失望，电影的质量是有目共睹的普通。在花絮里看到郑渊洁和郑亚琪父子，想来想去，这也只是一个人的童话帝国，能左右的事情太少了。
为了追忆童年来看的，道具布景确实满满的童年回忆，故事已经看不进去了，还是心已经老了
另外这部剧第一标签居然是喜剧真是搞不懂，从头到尾我只在阴暗中感到悲哀。
舒克和贝塔入坑，也喜欢上了皮皮鲁鲁西西两兄妹，当然还有罐头小人们..虽然本片没有原著那么精彩，但能够在这个年纪在荧幕上看到童年回忆也确实是难能可贵的，就冲这波回忆杀，三星也给定了。
不愧是你郑渊洁～带着两个小朋友安安生生看完了包括彩蛋的全部内容，实属观影最优记录～有点担心起火那段情节会被诟病，安全教育不合格🙄
本想给一星，实在是觉得没意思。可能是长大了，再也不相信郑渊洁的童话了。
不是因为我是郑渊洁爷爷忠实的读者我才会打出五星，而是因为郑渊洁的故事，小孩世界里的喜怒哀乐展现得淋漓尽致，一如我小时候所经历和幻想过的世界，就算电影质量中规中矩，小演员演技青涩，郑渊洁故事中那充满善良和童趣的内核也依然在闪闪发光。
也是圆了童年的梦吧。小学时最喜欢郑渊洁的病菌集中营
很不错的片子。最后我也猛男落泪了……没什么大毛病，儿童片能有这样的水准就可以了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
