A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
同一天看的特种部队：蛇眼崛起，我觉得峰爆应该教一下好莱坞怎么拍电影，美中不足是特效五毛了一些
影片开头还挺不错的，到后半段开始觉得没什么意思了，中规中矩吧
国内拍这类片子果然还是有很长的路要走，煽情不应当成为主要部分，我对这类的期待是特效够好够惊心动魄，人物行为逻辑合理就行，但是都不达标。
之前看了点映。我实在太喜欢里面“家可以重建，人必须活着!’这句话了!瞬间联想到这段时间各种真实的救援故事，在灾难面前，人民永远至上，人民也永远可以相信中国式救援。里面的场景和特效也超级棒，很多都是演员实景拍摄，给人很真实的感觉。演员们的演技也是可圈可点，每个都是实力派演员，看着就很过瘾，全程无尿点，里面小洪和老洪的父子情让人潸然泪下，仿佛看到了生活中的自己与父母，明明很关心对方却不知道怎么表达。总的来说就是非常好看，已经决定中秋带上父母和家里人一起去二刷了。
把老爸强行写挂真的好吗？就为了承接前面的照片？
个人英雄主义略重 情感的描写稍微有点突兀了
提起中国的发展，第一条基本都是交通便利，而这便利背后却是平均一公里会有一个铁道兵牺牲的队伍
二是心疼
不比国外大片差的国产灾难片，值得推荐，我愿当个自来水
被普及了铁道兵的常识，和平年代牺牲最大的部队，感谢这群人
終於知道為什麼老一輩把演員稱作「跳梁小丑」，或者用廣東話講「馬騮戲」⋯所謂方法演技不過是戲太多，穿上戲服就是持牌唬人，對症下藥便是王道；順帶調侃了一下自以為比好萊塢高尚的歐洲，惰性是褒是貶永遠成疑。安東尼奧班德拉斯演的是橫跨歐美、食兩家茶米的自己，當被罵「金錢的奴隸」，他用一句「你也是奴隸，只是金錢比我少」有力還擊；忽然聯想到即將上映的某漫改救市大作被曝出「一人分飾兩角」是權宜之計的內幕，如此看來本片的尺度也算小了⋯
在主旋律这个范畴下，不比战狼2差。（一个是战争片，一个是灾难片，只能横向比较）
国内拍这类片子果然还是有很长的路要走，煽情不应当成为主要部分，我对这类的期待是特效够好够惊心动魄，人物行为逻辑合理就行，但是都不达标。
佩内洛普再不四封戈雅就该婉拒提名了…最搞笑的其实是马丁内斯的角色，装到了一定境界。和剧情辩论的一样片子讽刺的有点“高级”了，非影迷观众笑不太动
陪基友看的点映，前半段不错，后半段形而上学地瞎扯，全片配乐非常糟糕，结尾铁道兵致敬部分相当不错，决定十一出行改坐火车
电影院去看的imax。
后面有些逻辑bug，但电影传达的精神都传达了
还真是有趣。一方面看着两个男主的斗争 你会慢慢发现 这一切的背后导演才是最大控制者。从坐到菲利克斯腿上开始 到和太子女热吻 到粉碎他们的奖 她一直都是处于一个“我是幕后但我掌控一切”的位置 其实想想 让两个人反目逼出他们的最高演技水平 到获奖 这不过是她的一场棋局。另外 换个角度想 电影会让人总倾向于利用菲利克斯靠浑水摸鱼上位的事情讽刺娱乐圈 但有没有想过 其实菲利克斯本身是真的有硬实力 只不过花边新闻太多 让人有一种希望看到退朝后他其实在裸泳但一直被他人生赢家的光环保护着没办法打他脸的感觉。怪就怪伊万命不太好吧。
中国初期到现在真是太不容易了 现在的便利都是之前的人用一条鲜活的生命 付出的代价 为他们的精神流泪
小洪徒手攀岩，老洪在后面跟来和老洪落崖敬礼那块真的感动哭了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
