Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
喜欢女主，多给一颗星。故事一般，但恐怖片也就这样啦，给个六分及格分
PS 中文片名的翻译真是太拉垮啊！这个续集字面意义是远离巴黎环路，呼应10年前的第一集的环路另一侧（也是意指两主演第一次搭档时两个世界观的相撞）。这一集主题也是与时俱进，远离环路来到了一个虚构的山村乡下城市，反应了当代极右的崛起。
前半段的斗智昏昏欲睡（花园蜘蛛略微提神），后半段与女巫斗勇突然肾上激素飙升，小演员表演的演技试金石不得不说恐怖惊悚类型是评判标准之一。
虽然是儿童向，但是儿童看又太恐怖。成人看又太幼稚，不知道它存在的意义了
想要吓人，但感觉只想通过音效营造出恐怖气氛，这点真的还得向温子仁多加学习。剧情也看得我一脸懵逼，一开始弟弟为什么要在树林里杀告密的人呢，又说把女儿抓走了，干活的没看到有女的…太多bug了，女主的演技也有待改进，相反小六子演技不错啊。整体对于国产恐怖片来说还是可以的了，虽然并不恐怖，还煽情。但是中途看着还是觉得有点无聊。
海⭐，女主好眼熟，但是名字完全没印象！剧情一般般
算中规中矩的网络电影了，剧情整体还行，梗概还不错。话说韩栋的戏份也太少了点吧，加起来有两分钟没？
前面真的有趣又可爱，但是后面男孩的动机真的让我有点摸不着头脑，让我结局观感不太好。
谁说这个片子恐怖啊？哪里恐怖啊。剧情还是有一些的，但是导演水平真的有限，比兄弟俩之前拍的奇门遁甲要差很多。鼓励一下多加一星。
Nightbooks.2021.1080p.NF.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.Atmos.HDR.HEVC-CM 绝命毒师里的她还变年轻漂亮了
像娜塔莎这样把小孩绑架来供吃供喝还指导他写作的良心女巫不多见了
国产恐怖片里算很好的了。项氏电影倒也不是必出精品，但品质确实有保证。王真儿也是演技在线，颜值有辨识度的好女主。
故事编的在网大中真的还可以啦，看到最后竟然有被感动到！弟弟还真中国版《水形物语》了😂
本来想给四星 可是女主太白莲花加绿茶了 居然背后捅刀我的漂亮女二～这讨厌的性格我直接给三星😂😂导演拍的很不错
女巫吓小孩，女巫吃小孩，女巫拐小孩，小孩恐怖片。有这样的女巫还跑？老子跟她玩一辈子
刚看完，在恐怖片里还算是不错的，到最后水猴子救孩子那里很感人。
喜欢小演员 他的表情太丰富了 电影虽然有点惊悚 但是很治愈
真就是小孩子看不懂，大人又不爱看的作品，白瞎了那么好的标题了，没啥好说的，一星。
没啥意思，爱写恐怖故事的小孩，爱听恐怖故事的女巫，爱用恐怖故事控制女巫的女巫。
我太热爱这种儿童向邪典了，看冒险小虎队长大的影响。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
