剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 典映冬 2小时前 :

    天,后劲太大了!出不去难道是因为我是养狗人士吗,仅此而已吗

  • 友越彬 0小时前 :

    没有想象中感动我。这片最优秀是唯一主演,省了很多片酬。一眼望到头的故事是最大短板,你知道他会死,也知道到死一定感动你,这种感动就弱化了很多

  • 刑泽语 0小时前 :

    和《我是传奇》放到一起来看,就能感受到末日想象中的细微变化。人类终将让位给人工智能和宠物。

  • 叶昂然 8小时前 :

    #豆瓣评论不可靠系列#好看,前面情节是推进慢,但是不无聊。从机器人视角出发 介绍世界观,让观众和机器人一起成长。本质上是个父子情的片子。桃子罐头还是小技巧,后面扔球的戏非常好,编剧厉害。情绪很足。汉克斯演的有多好呢 就是也看不出炫技 但是不知不觉已经把你的心俘获了

  • 堵凌翠 1小时前 :

    对于同类的不信任,以致只愿意对一只狗承担责任,造一个机器人爱自己,是末世宅的慰籍。

  • 卫凌轩 9小时前 :

    末世是老美擅长的题材,人工智能版温情版本《我是传奇》,Goodyear是轮胎(不是),是没能和家人一起度过的日子。人工智能再怎么智慧,似乎也只能装模作样地继承人类的情感,0和1之外还有无法度量的事务。配乐和镜头感极好

  • 戏冬易 4小时前 :

    —末日题材往往太重末日,轻情感。此片有点《我是传奇》和《机器人总动员》的感观。

  • 妫天宇 1小时前 :

    故事很励志温馨,没有过分煽情,一切都恰到好处。对末世的描绘以及人性的险恶,都为影片增色不少。

  • 亥文姝 1小时前 :

    一个四不像,十几年前的WALLE都能在一个让人萌爆的机器人设定上碾压,I am Legend虽然颠覆了原著思维,但末世孤胆英雄+一条狗的故事双重碾压Finch,公路片?你是基丁吗?Jeff凭什么诞生,不解释;太阳爆发能破坏臭氧层是相当严重的,不仅是紫外线和通讯失效而已,全世界如何,不解释;连Finch是个什么样的人都没解释清楚,不愿go to the world和不合群不信任人是两件没关系的事,如何能从他的几次讲故事里拼出他这个人?好吧,我想多了,看了一眼imdb和mc,这就是个普通中等制作,根本没想把故事往有科幻完整设定的路上去走。。。但就是,何德何能在豆瓣拿到8.4然后把我骗进来啊。。。

  • 干希彤 1小时前 :

    开头还挺末世朋克科幻的,越往后越冗长,不知所谓

  • 初沛 3小时前 :

    看到芬奇的造型,我马上着手试了试能不能把我的电脑音箱也改造成机器人

  • 同飞兰 7小时前 :

    最后杰夫独自坐在那里看着夕阳,想到他即将面对的,感觉是无比的悲伤残忍,就像当初芬奇出发时一样吧,孤独却又仍含希望。

  • 孔幼荷 4小时前 :

    D— / 狠好,2021年了还在努力为豆瓣top250输送后备电影。

  • 巩晓灵 8小时前 :

    They made a robot to care lives. We made politics to kill.

  • 敬晴波 2小时前 :

    其实30分钟足够了,多出来的时间无非就是在积攒观众的情绪

  • 仕林 5小时前 :

    有点无趣了,苹果拍的网大,虽然比网飞绝大多数有质感些,但是内容还是太空了!

  • 周耘志 9小时前 :

    一人一狗一机器的末世公路片,人类的爱与信仰在机器身上传递和永生,肉身的宿命悲剧和精神与希望的永恒一下子击中我,太爱这种命题了。与其说爱狗不如说是坚守人类底线,至少还有责任与付出。居然在机器人身上看到了生命与活着的欲望,理由很简单只是为了明天还要给狗狗喂食和陪它玩球而已。结局真的超级浪漫和悲壮,没死在金门大桥也算是意料之外的套路了(喂!)而且我也好想和jeff握握手呜呜这是怎么拍出来的啊看起来手感也太好了,一股子复古纯机械风叮叮当当的感觉也好戳我

  • 佛雅丹 8小时前 :

    一个宅男发明家芬奇发明了一个机器人杰夫。这个桥段多么似曾相识,仿佛天马博士发明了阿童木。发明机器人的初衷是将履行一项使命:在芬奇离开人世后,将由杰夫来照顾他唯一的寄托:他的狗狗。在这末日的背景下,偌大的世界好像只有一个人,一条狗,一个机器人,似乎看不到什么生机。杰夫学习的很快,他的思维方式,他的表达越来越像一个人。 仿佛是芬奇的孩子,他会大意会闯祸,会顽皮。大爷必须收起他的臭脾气,耐心的教导机器人。机器人越来越像一个人,他学会了开车,学会了修车,学会了逗狗狗。机器人越来越完善,芬奇的身体却越来越差,不知道能不能支撑到他们的希望之地金门大桥。黑暗的来临令人害怕和踹踹不安,但是黎明终会到来。 即便世界已经到了末日,只要你心中还有信仰,还有寄托,即便只是一个机器人依旧能传承你的希望。

  • 俎星海 8小时前 :

    荒岛余生+超能查派,把全人类最后的余光压力放在这一个人身上,戏可以加太多。

  • 圣语薇 2小时前 :

    剧本太工整了,完全都可以猜到下一步该做什么了,可以说是为了催泪而感人,又因为需要按照好莱坞的套路把每一个环节都点到为止,导致整片的剧情都在赶节奏。因此那些本应很感人的情节,虽然确实还是感动了我,但感动之余的感觉是被套路了一样……这种腔调我并不是很中意。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved