Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
想看很久了是因为我初中也写过有关月球坠落的小小说。。。电影总的来说还是那一套，命题模板作文实在没什么意思，换一百个设定能套壳写出一百部类似的，而且人类起源那点简直鬼扯到不可思议，外星人祖先也就算了还黑一把AI我真服了。唯一出彩的是特效，海啸上天和月球内部的CG制作年度奇观，不过快进看完也就只能记住这些了
哈利贝瑞除了演技没啥进步之外（当然这种片子也没啥表演要求），整个人似乎也丧失了吸引观众的魅力。再加上这个片子里大段无聊的文戏，跟看俄罗斯科幻片也没啥区别。
看开头还以为中国女孩是Jo的女友，还想说这片子这么woke吗我喜欢，结果到头来是个莫名其妙的交换生，引发了一系列莫名其妙的地球支线，月球设定也比我想象的要无趣得多，还以为是恐怖片不可知走向的，结果是个啥，阴谋论+伪科幻？果然中方投资+好莱坞商业片就不要指望太多。两颗星全给hot af的帕翠和Halle。
为特效加颗星 为中空的月球加颗星 哦 我的天 居然还有戴森球 我回头就造一个
哈莉 贝瑞 老了
教科书级别的好莱坞科幻大烂片，剧情老套、角色老套、设定老套，艾默里奇老了
看起来像后天的父子情+2012的前妻再婚家庭的综合体。看完我觉得导演媳妇是不是再婚了，已经两部把再婚丈夫拍死了
吉吉国王真的很吉星高照，把自己代入吉吉国王视角真的很爽，感觉自己的智慧也是可以在古代闯下一番大事业的呢。
深海、巨物、幽闭恐惧症者慎重，反之也会非常喜欢这种视觉震撼。
看了等於沒看，好像導演的作品都是這樣，類型也是科幻不科幻災難不災難的，劇情人物設定讓人尷尬，唯一還可看的是特效場景
是什么原因分数这么低。就凭对人类起源的诠释就值得一看。
太扯淡了，说好的灾难片，转眼就是廉价科幻片了？
可能设定本身就是最大的原罪吧，好好地灾难片非要加入科幻元素，我就是单纯的想看月球毁灭，结果告诉我月球是人造的，空心内部亿万年前人类最后残存的家园。所以落点是让现在的人类警惕AI意识觉醒吗？灾难不够灾，科幻不够新，亲情不够煽，逻辑又太多硬伤，确实是泛善可陈，9点多亿的投资，华谊实惨！
除了月球以及外星粒子的设定比较有意思，其余的剧情都很生硬尴尬和无聊，父子、母子、父女、前妻以及前夫还有中国人女保姆之间的故事及感情戏都好生硬，一句话故事设定和特效还行，剧情超烂。
埃莫里奇说想跟流浪地球的导演合作，我觉得不完全是因为华谊的投资，可能有当真的成份，这俩片真的挺像的。
感觉感情线写的还蛮爽的，谁不想和貌美大小姐谈恋爱呢？尤其女主还这么漂亮，这个感情线还挺带感。
月亮从背后探头(?)那幕也太好笑了草…地上那条线可以全删了 （我一度以为于文文演哈利贝瑞老婆😬 （成本1.5亿刀rip
全程节奏无尿点反转不少，人物也比较完整扎实，启辰大哥十分了得。
可以说每个剧情点都蠢到极点，无法想象编剧是在什么状态下写的这个本子
好歹也是艾默里奇啊，找的这都什么咖，男主儿子从头到尾一个表情一个嗓音，塞进去的华裔演员格格不入，杀手山姆演个小配角还行，上男二有些难挑大梁，最惨的是哈莉贝瑞，电影到一半我都没认出来是她，真是泯然于众人...
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
