Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
梅朵和卓玛很好看，草原很好看。悲剧的设置和情节的发展以及后半小时的狗尾续貂实在是不高明。
一部聚焦偏远地区教育题材的电影.一部直击人心的真实电影，一个小人物的英雄式坚持，艺术与真实。
但是安彦良和你为啥不做钢坦克!
是有温度的片子，藏区孩子那种渴望知识的眼神和灿烂的笑容感染前来支教的老师，他奉献了自己的一生让更多的人走出去，他说人生的意义在此。藏区草原的风景太美啦，每个画面都像一幅画，梅朵的笑靥仿佛可以战胜一切困难…
咳咳咳，想去草原，找个藏族姑娘，劈柴喂马牧羊……远离城市喧嚣……
真真正正用心拍的电影，希望导演多拍这类题材电影。
总觉得像什么，好像看过。记起来了《教室里的一头牦牛》。题材不错，藏区支教。
不管细节，只说人生的意义，还是很感人的，敬佩！
对于机械/兵器刻画的过度执着，忽视对人与人、人与战争的关系性的思考，使0079中真正的母题反而居于次位，这也是整个UC宇宙的作品在新世纪面临的共同和根本问题
婚后依然叫他老师
然后最大的问题是过于的武林高手，整个就是照着剑戟片搞得，基本上完全舍掉的萝卜感，这与哈萨维正好相反，但你说这个好嘛，我觉得不好，一堆武林高手过招，挨个送，既没有逻辑又没有意思，你要不是萝卜，是个古代剑戟片，那逻辑其实是对的，整个故事不太有意思
一直对青藏高原有一种向往，这是一个难得的好剧！
总觉得像什么，好像看过。记起来了《教室里的一头牦牛》。题材不错，藏区支教。
温情，如一碗暖暖的鸡汤温暖人们的心灵，让人心得以慰藉。
高清重制rx78，还有高清重制的“连我爸爸都没有打过我”，如果做成tv接the origin将是绝杀，唯一的遗憾流程太短。
故事都没讲明白，为什么明知道岛上被击坠两台ms+一台运输机还派一样的配置去侦查？为什么阿姆罗要主动关闭通讯导致失联？后面又是为什么核弹在天上炸了？剧情主线要讨论起来硬伤就很多。更别说木马三宝和南十字星这些支线了。
他在黑板上写下“知识改变命运”，看见那些学生渴望知识的眼神，我想如果我是他们的老师，我一定是既开心又心疼。每个当老师的，看见自己的学生那么迫切的渴望学习，都会很欣慰吧。里面有段台词是韩松的内心独白“如果我没有到过这里，我无法形容孩子们的艰苦贫瘠；如果我不曾看到过孩子们的眼神，我理解不到他们对知识的渴望；如果我当初也选择了逃避，我一定会遗憾终生。” 演员没有华丽的外表，淳朴的画风让观众有代入感。这是一部弘扬正能量的片子，也希望更多的人能够投入到边区支教事业，让更多的孩子走出大山，去看看更广阔的世界。
本来放在tv里合理的剧情长度在这里放大拉长却没有更深入地描写，阿姆罗和多安的心路历程完全没有侧重，跟gto三部曲类似的高规格制作却又没有严谨的动作逻辑，矛盾又可惜的一作
感觉有许多意味不明的镜头，还喜欢用拉进来表现人物正在思考……还是富野那种切换得干净利落毫不留恋比较有味…不过老人家开心就好！健健康康！
韩老师真正做到为人师者，受到人们的钦佩。看完电影也激励我们，好好生活，做祖国为人民贡献自己的一份力量。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
